3.1 Reports
Forum Genevois sur la Sécurité. Recommandations sur la vidéosurveillance. June 2016.
LegislationRecommendationsVideo surveillance
The use of video surveillance is part of a broader security concept, but it can seriously infringe on privacy, and strict requirements must be met before implementation. Before installing a surveillance system, one must consider the risks that need to be addressed and determine if less intrusive measures can achieve the same goals. An effective security strategy should include technical, organizational, and human components.
Favre, Eric, Marcel-Aymé Chevalley, and Herman Constanzo. Quid de la vidéosurveillance en Ville de Genève? Constats et perspectives. 2008.
LegislationVideo surveillance
Post-September 11, societies increasingly radicalize their security approach, investing in urban security technologies. The UK exemplifies this with a ratio of 1 surveillance camera per 14 inhabitants. However, video surveillance is not a security cure-all, and its effectiveness remains debated. In Geneva, legislation is unclear, and a draft law on personal data protection is being considered. This report recommends applying video surveillance standards, initiating public debate, and formalizing security policies.
Kaenzig, Raoul & Francisco Klauser. Evaluation de la vidéoprotection dans le quartier des Pâquis (2014–2016). Université de Neuchâtel, 2016.
Video surveillancePâquis
The final report on the evaluation of video protection in the Pâquis district is divided into two distinct parts. The first forms the theoretical and methodological basis of the evaluation. The second presents the final results of the evaluation of the video surveillance system in Pâquis, two years after the cameras went into service, structured along five axes corresponding to the terms of reference.
3.2 News Articles
rts.ch. "Les drones perçus comme des caméras de surveillance en Suisse." InfoSport, 22 March 2016.
SurveillanceDronesPublic opinionPublic spaces
In Switzerland alone, there are an estimated 22,000 drones for public or private use. Francisco Klause, professor of Geography at the University of Neuchâtel, led a survey on the social acceptability of drones — the first of its kind. For 87% of people surveyed, drones are perceived as mobile surveillance cameras. The same majority claims the right to be informed when one is observed. Finally, 72% of opinions collected would approve banning any observation of public spaces by drones.
Francey, Olivier. "Le bilan contrasté de la vidéosurveillance à Genève." Le Temps, 15 November 2016.
SurveillanceCamerasPublic spacesPâquis
"Dans la sécurité, la technologie s'invite à tous les échelons." Heidi.news, 21 December 2022.
SurveillanceTechnologySecurityPrivacyArtificial intelligenceAlgorithms
Surveillance technology is pervasive yet often unseen, operating in a passive manner. In Geneva, the extent of digital surveillance remains uncertain, with no centralized database for camera locations. Some cameras are privately owned but accessible to the police. The data generated by our behaviors enables preemptive action against crime. Police now employ predictive policing software, leveraging automated algorithms and various data sources for analysis.
"Données personnelles: Gare, gare!" Blick, 25 February 2023.
CFFData collectionPrivacyVideo surveillance
The Swiss Federal Railways (CFF) plan to use cameras to collect anonymous statistical data on passenger flow through train stations, including age and gender, to optimize restaurant and store locations and manage crowds. Opponents worry about the potential invasiveness of the technology and the possibility of collecting personal information in the future.
"Avec les CFF, on a déjà pris le train de la surveillance de masse." Heidi.news.
CFFData collectionPrivacyVideo surveillance
The article reports on a surveillance system implemented by the Swiss Federal Railways (SBB) that collects information from the passenger Wi-Fi network, including IP addresses, device information, and browsing history, and uses it to track and identify individuals. This data is shared with law enforcement authorities upon request. The article discusses concerns about the lack of transparency and consent surrounding this system.
"Pas de surveillance de masse dans les gares suisses!" AlgorithmWatch CH.
CFFData collectionPrivacyVideo surveillance
Swiss Federal Railways (CFF) plan to extensively monitor over 50 Swiss railway stations from September 2023, collecting and analyzing sensitive data including passenger movements, purchases, and personal characteristics using a new customer attendance measurement system. Hidden cameras will capture information such as age, sex, and baggage details. Civil society organizations urge the CFF to refrain from implementing biometric identification and tracking systems.
"«Pas de reconnaissance faciale dans les gares»." SBB News.
CFFData collectionPrivacyVideo surveillanceInterview
Swiss Federal Railways (CFF) have launched a public tender to install a new passenger flow management system in train stations. The CFF has clarified that facial recognition will not be used in the new system and that it is committed to respecting data protection laws. The public and data protection officials have been critical of the potential use of facial recognition in the project.
"Traqués à notre insu: Faute de dire «non», la Suisse est en train de dire «oui»." Heidi.news.
CFFData collectionPrivacyVideo surveillance
Swiss federal law is the only law that regulates facial recognition in public spaces, leaving private companies free to use it. The federal data protection commissioner is asking the CFF to carry out a risk assessment before launching its facial recognition programme for commercial purposes. The programme will be deployed in 50 Swiss stations, starting with Schaffhausen from September 2023.
"Caméras dans les gares – «Les gens craignent une société de surveillance de masse»." Tribune de Genève, 23 February 2023.
CFFData collectionPrivacyVideo surveillance
The Swiss are increasingly worried about the rise of a surveillance society. A poll showed that 60% of respondents felt that the right to privacy was threatened, with fears over government access to personal data without permission. Respondents were also concerned about the use of facial recognition technology, with 72% saying they were against the technology being used in public spaces.
"Reconnaissance faciale – Le projet de caméras des CFF suscite une levée de boucliers." Tribune de Genève, 16 February 2023.
CFFData collectionPrivacyVideo surveillance
The Swiss Federal Railways (CFF) plan to install cameras at several train stations across Switzerland has sparked concerns among civil liberties advocates and data protection experts, who fear the move will lead to an increase in surveillance and a breach of privacy.
Meschenmoser, M. "SBB bespitzeln Passagiere bald auf Schritt und Tritt." KTIPP.ch.
CFFData collectionPrivacyVideo surveillance
The Swiss Federal Railways (SBB) are allegedly planning to introduce a new surveillance system that would track passengers' movements and activities in real-time using cameras and sensors. The article raises concerns about the potential invasion of privacy and violation of personal rights that such a system could entail.
3.3 Academic Articles
Kaenzig, Raoul, and Francisco Klauser. "Vidéosurveillance et insécurités urbaines: Etude de l'efficacité préventive du dispositif de caméras installé au quartier des Pâquis à Genève."
Video surveillancePublic spaceCriminalityPâquis
Drawing upon police statistics, this paper explores the impacts of CCTV cameras installed in November 2014 in the Pâquis neighbourhood in Geneva. In line with former studies, the results underline the limited preventative effects of the CCTV system. The analysis shows that cameras are inducing criminality displacement, mainly of drug trafficking. Overall, the study provides a differentiated and complex image of CCTV systems as instruments of territorialization of monitored areas.
Klauser, Francisco. "La vidéosurveillance comme mécanisme de production disciplinaire de l'espace public." Bulletin de l'Association de géographes français 81, no. 4 (2004): 631–646.
Video surveillancePublic spacePowerTerritoriality
Based on a spatial distribution study of video-surveillance cameras in Geneva, this article explores various surveillance strategies and their impact on urban territory. The dominance of private institutions using video surveillance fosters privatization, disciplinary measures, and territorial fragmentation. In Geneva, 37.5% of cameras in public spaces belong to the financial sector. Concerningly, residents are unaware whether they are being filmed by private or state actors.
Klauser, Francisco & Raoul Kaenzig. "Territorialisation à distance par caméra vidéo: Perception de la vidéosurveillance au quartier des Pâquis à Genève." Geogr Helv 72:3 (2017): 271–282.
Video surveillancePublic spacePublic opinionPâquis
Based on two surveys conducted in Geneva in 2015 and 2016, this paper examines residents' perceptions of video surveillance in the Pâquis area. It reveals that when control is delegated to distant systems, a "mental distance" emerges between those being monitored and the surveillance system. People quickly forget about the cameras, and the cameras gradually lose relevance in daily life, limiting their symbolic power.
3.4 Legal Notices
Le PPDT – Vidéosurveillance — Avis de droit du 10 octobre 2022. ge.ch.
Video surveillancePersonal dataLPD
The "Préposé cantonal à la protection des données et à la transparence" (PPDT) has been asked about the use of "bodycams" in Geneva's prisons, and more particularly about the conformity of the use of "bodycams" with the current legal framework.
Le PPDT – Vidéosurveillance — Avis du 22 mars 2022. ge.ch.
Video surveillancePersonal dataLPD
On March 16, 2022, the Department of the Territory requested the opinion of the Cantonal Data Protection and Transparency Commissioner in the context of a draft law on waste (PL 12993). The Department wishes to authorize the installation of video surveillance systems for the purpose of prosecuting offences and to allow the recording of offences based on video surveillance.
Le PPDT – Vidéosurveillance — Avis du 7 septembre 2021. ge.ch.
Video surveillancePersonal dataLPD
The Secretary General of the Judicial Power submitted a project for a Judicial Power regulation on access to documents and personal data to the Cantonal Ombudsman for review. The Judicial Power intends for the project to take the form of a regulation rather than a directive of application of the LIPAD due to its independence.
Le PPDT – Vidéosurveillance — Avis du 28 juin 2021. ge.ch.
Video surveillancePersonal dataLPD
The Department of Territory requested the opinion of the Cantonal Ombudsman for Data Protection and Transparency on a proposed modification to the LIPAD. The modification aims to add a new purpose for video surveillance: to ensure public health in communal waste disposal sites and prevent illegal dumping and damage.
Le PPDT – Vidéosurveillance — Avis du 8 octobre 2020. ge.ch.
Video surveillancePersonal dataLPD
The Department of Territory requested the opinion of the Cantonal Ombudsman for Data Protection and Transparency on a proposed law on waste, specifically regarding the use of video surveillance recordings in the identification of offenses. The legal basis for the request is Article 56 paragraph 3 letter e of the LIPAD and Article 23 paragraph 8 of the RIPAD.
Le PPDT – Vidéosurveillance — Avis de droit du 8 janvier 2019. ge.ch.
Video surveillancePersonal dataLPD
The cantonal commissioner is regularly approached by individuals who wish to install a video surveillance system that would film, incidentally, small portions of the public domain. This situation is legally unclear due to the involvement of several authorities and rules relating to video surveillance that leave a certain margin of appreciation. This legal opinion recalls the applicable rules and focuses on the "grey zone" of private surveillance of a portion of the public domain.
Le PPDT – Vidéosurveillance — Avis du 27 février 2018. ge.ch.
Video surveillancePersonal dataLPD
The Director of Legal Affairs at the Canton of Geneva's Detention Office requested the opinion of the Cantonal Data Protection and Transparency Officer on a proposed regulation on security and hearing brigades. The regulation included a chapter on video surveillance based on the Swiss Criminal Code and other federal laws.
Le PPDT – Vidéosurveillance — Avis du 17 mai 2016. ge.ch.
Video surveillancePersonal dataLPD
The State Internal Audit Service found in December 2015 that the Directorate General of Transports (DGT) did not comply with certain provisions of the LIPAD in the management of traffic cameras. The DGT recorded continuous images for traffic surveillance and analysis, which was contrary to the RIPAD. It is suggested that the RIPAD should be adapted to allow for continuous recording.
Le PPDT – Vidéosurveillance — Avis du 4 mars 2014. ge.ch.
Video surveillancePersonal dataLPD
The Deputy Secretary General of the Department of Security and Economy submitted a draft regulation on the establishment of detention for detainees requiring psychiatric care to the Cantonal Data Protection and Transparency Commissioner for review, due to its impact on personal data protection under Article 64 on the video surveillance system.